Consultation
Youth are asked for feedback after adults have mostly defined the problem and possible solutions.
- · Framing is set before youth are involved.
- · Input is advisory, not binding.
- · Participation ends when feedback is collected.
The Co-Author Initiative develops the policy pathway for moving young people from consultation to co-authorship in local decision-making.
The Co-Author Initiative is in the research and framework-design phase. No policy proposal has been introduced. Draft instruments, comparative case research, and recommendations will follow as the work advances.
Most institutions describe youth participation in similar language. The Initiative studies what distinguishes consultation from genuine co-authorship.
Youth are asked for feedback after adults have mostly defined the problem and possible solutions.
Youth help define the problem, draft proposals, review language, and shape implementation from the beginning.
The Framework outlines four levels of youth participation in policymaking, from consultation to shared governance.
Youth are asked for feedback after adults have mostly defined the problem and possible solutions.
Youth review drafted proposals before adoption and can flag concerns, but do not shape initial framing.
Youth participate in writing the language of proposals and contribute to defining the problem.
Youth hold defined, ongoing roles in decision-making and implementation alongside adult institutional actors.
The eventual goal is a clearly documented framework that institutions and governance bodies can use to design meaningful roles for young people in shaping policy — beyond consultation.
Framework currently in development. PARALLAX does not publish draft legislation, campaigns, petitions, or policy demands.